Talk:World Archives Project: Rhode Island, Vital Extracts, Church Records, 1636-1850
Feel free to add to or edit information in this discussion tab as necessary. Please take time to become familiar with the General Keying Standards and be sure to read all instructions on the main project page. (Please note that in case of a discrepancy, project level instructions always trump general keying standards.)
Extra Keying Helps
Common Keying Errors Found by Reviewers
Questions and Answers
If you have a keying question that is not answered on the project page or in any of the information above, click “EDIT” and ask it here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.
Q: I have a birth records entry which reads GOULD THOMAS, OF THOMAS AND SARAH, MIDDLETOWN, JULY 11, 1728. The next line reads JOHN, OCT. 29, 1736. Am I to assume (and key) that John is also the son of Thomas & Sarah born in Middletown? Or do I only key John's name and birthdate as seen?
- A: I am looking into this right now - if you could post a screen shot of the record that would help as I have not seen this in other records.Annafechter 23:36, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
I have tried and tried. Its not letting me take a screen shot. I think the answer is to just key as seen (making no assumptions) as the dates aren't chronological and start skipping around. Sorry for the trouble.
- Thank you for trying. If we determine that the children in between the names of the children with parents should belong to the same parents we can make these adjustments after the data has been entered.
If you have a suggestion or would like to make an addition to the project page, click “EDIT” and post your suggestion here. (If you click on Rich Editor you won't have to worry about formatting your entry.) Then click “WATCH” at the top right on this page and you will be notified via email when an update has been made.